<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Oscars meet the grouch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bokeen.com/1875/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bokeen.com/1875</link>
	<description>my blog is funnier than yours</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:40:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.bokeen.com/1875/comment-page-1#comment-2651</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 09:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokeen.com/?p=1875#comment-2651</guid>
		<description>As much as I agree with you about Sandra BullockS, I still like her. After seeing a bunch of interviews on YouTube with her, because, you know, that&#039;s what normal people are doing with their time, she just seems like a genuine person and I don&#039;t feel like she&#039;s diva-ish. However, I will ALWAYS love her for being involved as an EP of The George Lopez Show, one of the most under-rated family comedies of all time.

And I agree, SJP is an zoo creature. Sex and the City should have been rated NC-17 on HBO for excessive amounts of bestiality. I&#039;m not sure whether Matthew Broderick is into that sorta thing, or if he just wanted a pet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I agree with you about Sandra BullockS, I still like her. After seeing a bunch of interviews on YouTube with her, because, you know, that&#8217;s what normal people are doing with their time, she just seems like a genuine person and I don&#8217;t feel like she&#8217;s diva-ish. However, I will ALWAYS love her for being involved as an EP of The George Lopez Show, one of the most under-rated family comedies of all time.</p>
<p>And I agree, SJP is an zoo creature. Sex and the City should have been rated NC-17 on HBO for excessive amounts of bestiality. I&#8217;m not sure whether Matthew Broderick is into that sorta thing, or if he just wanted a pet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shak</title>
		<link>http://www.bokeen.com/1875/comment-page-1#comment-1767</link>
		<dc:creator>Shak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokeen.com/?p=1875#comment-1767</guid>
		<description>As much as I agree with you about Sandra BullockS, I still like her. After seeing a bunch of interviews on YouTube with her, because, you know, that&#039;s what normal people are doing with their time, she just seems like a genuine person and I don&#039;t feel like she&#039;s diva-ish. However, I will ALWAYS love her for being involved as an EP of The George Lopez Show, one of the most under-rated family comedies of all time.

And I agree, SJP is an zoo creature. Sex and the City should have been rated NC-17 on HBO for excessive amounts of bestiality. I&#039;m not sure whether Matthew Broderick is into that sorta thing, or if he just wanted a pet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I agree with you about Sandra BullockS, I still like her. After seeing a bunch of interviews on YouTube with her, because, you know, that&#8217;s what normal people are doing with their time, she just seems like a genuine person and I don&#8217;t feel like she&#8217;s diva-ish. However, I will ALWAYS love her for being involved as an EP of The George Lopez Show, one of the most under-rated family comedies of all time.</p>
<p>And I agree, SJP is an zoo creature. Sex and the City should have been rated NC-17 on HBO for excessive amounts of bestiality. I&#8217;m not sure whether Matthew Broderick is into that sorta thing, or if he just wanted a pet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donof</title>
		<link>http://www.bokeen.com/1875/comment-page-1#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>Donof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokeen.com/?p=1875#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>I like the &quot;talentless container of douche&quot; line.  That was too funny. I totally agree that although Bullock was decent in &quot;A Blind Side&quot;, she didn&#039;t deserve the Oscar. Even if she made good movies in the past, she still wouldn&#039;t deserve it.  It was a pretty good performance in a pretty good movie. That movie being nominated for best picture was an even bigger sham.  &quot;A Blind Side&quot; was very similar to &quot;Rudy&quot;. &quot;Rudy&quot; was probably slightly better, but it would have been a laughable best picture nomination. It&#039;s like they gave it a best picture nomination to justify giving Bullock the Oscar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the &#8220;talentless container of douche&#8221; line.  That was too funny. I totally agree that although Bullock was decent in &#8220;A Blind Side&#8221;, she didn&#8217;t deserve the Oscar. Even if she made good movies in the past, she still wouldn&#8217;t deserve it.  It was a pretty good performance in a pretty good movie. That movie being nominated for best picture was an even bigger sham.  &#8220;A Blind Side&#8221; was very similar to &#8220;Rudy&#8221;. &#8220;Rudy&#8221; was probably slightly better, but it would have been a laughable best picture nomination. It&#8217;s like they gave it a best picture nomination to justify giving Bullock the Oscar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boqueen</title>
		<link>http://www.bokeen.com/1875/comment-page-1#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>boqueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokeen.com/?p=1875#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>Those arms! Those arms!

Kill me now. I love her, but seriously...dress body-appropriate, PLEASE. For the love of all that is holy.

I must say I disagree about Gabby not having any more new roles. It could be because I&#039;m a negressa, but Hollywood isn&#039;t 100% Kiera Knightley Skinny. She&#039;ll make more appearances in film and TV. Starring role? Maybe, but I&#039;m sure this isn&#039;t the LAST we&#039;ve seen of her.

SJPeePee failed me. That fashion queen really should have chosen something that showed off her toned figure. I would never in a million years wear something so straight up and down. The neckline was great, but come on! You&#039;re a woman for a reason!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those arms! Those arms!</p>
<p>Kill me now. I love her, but seriously&#8230;dress body-appropriate, PLEASE. For the love of all that is holy.</p>
<p>I must say I disagree about Gabby not having any more new roles. It could be because I&#8217;m a negressa, but Hollywood isn&#8217;t 100% Kiera Knightley Skinny. She&#8217;ll make more appearances in film and TV. Starring role? Maybe, but I&#8217;m sure this isn&#8217;t the LAST we&#8217;ve seen of her.</p>
<p>SJPeePee failed me. That fashion queen really should have chosen something that showed off her toned figure. I would never in a million years wear something so straight up and down. The neckline was great, but come on! You&#8217;re a woman for a reason!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

